Alaa Trifi vs Lorenzo Sciahbasi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 11:31 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Trifi vs L. Sciahbasi

TUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Trifi 1 - 0 Sciahbasi
They have played 3 sets in total, with Alaa Trifi winning 2 and Lorenzo Sciahbasi winning 1. The last match between Alaa Trifi and Lorenzo Sciahbasi was at the M25 Monastir, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Alaa Trifi getting the victory 2-6 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trifi | 1 |
| Sciahbasi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Monastir(11-05-25)
A. Trifi vs L. Sciahbasi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 43.66% (31-40) | Career Total W/L | 56.52% (65-50) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Trifi vs L. Sciahbasi Match Preview:
- In the past six months, Lorenzo Sciahbasi has won 46.08% of points on his second serve, outperforming Alaa Trifi, who has won 39.79%. Does this suggest Lorenzo has a serving advantage? Likely, yes.
- Considering their ability to return opponents' second serves, Alaa Trifi has reclaimed 49.84% compared to Lorenzo's 46.77%. Could this indicate a stronger return game for Alaa? Possibly.
- When facing first serves, both players exhibit solid performances with Alaa leading slightly at 30.66% versus Lorenzo at 28.61%.
- Under pressure, particularly in saving breakpoints, Lorenzo shows resilience with a 56.11% success rate while Alaa stands at 51.49%.
- Over the past year, Lorenzo has won 66.67% of his matches, starkly higher than Alaa's 46.94%. This could point to Lorenzo being in better form recently.
- Both players perform best on hard courts, securing a 63% win rate. However, Lorenzo struggles more on indoor hard courts compared to Alaa's issues on clay.
- Lorenzo's matches over the last year have come against opponents averaging a rank of 325.32, while Alaa has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 257.53. Does the tougher competition give Alaa an edge? It's debatable.
- In deciding sets over the past year, Lorenzo excels with a 62% win rate, whereas Alaa achieves a lower 47% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head statistics indicate a competitive match ahead, with each player having distinctive strengths. Lorenzo Sciahbasi exhibits a superior overall winning percentage over the past year, suggesting consistency and good form.
While Alaa Trifi shows a slightly better performance in return games, Lorenzo’s skill in critical situations, such as saving breakpoints and succeeding in deciding sets, might outweigh this. Additionally, Lorenzo's better recent second serve performance could make a substantial difference in close moments.
Alaa has faced higher-ranked opponents over the last year, which may imply toughness and adaptability, but the consistent performance and mental fortitude under pressure position Lorenzo Sciahbasi as the likely winner in this matchup.
Alaa Trifi vs Lorenzo Sciahbasi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Trifi vs L. Sciahbasi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 16 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:37:30 | Average Match Time | 2:37:30 |
| 74% (70/95) | 1st Serve % | 57% (64/113) |
| 74% (52/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (44/64) |
| 32% (8/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (21/49) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 42% (48/113) | Return Points Win % | 37% (35/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Trifi Recent Matches Played
L. Sciahbasi Recent Matches Played

A. Trifi vs L. Sciahbasi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43.66% (31/40) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.52% (65/50) |
| 44.58% (74/92) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.79% (143/118) |
| 48.81% (777/815) | Games Win/Loss | 53.11% (1262/1114) |
| 46.27% (31/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.70% (29/18) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.00% (33/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 88 | Aces Total | 282 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 240 | Total Double Faults | 252 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:47 |
| 300.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 336.91 |
| 59% (1547/2633) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3283/5571) |
| 63% (969/1547) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2171/3283) |
| 37% (405/1086) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1070/2288) |
| 44% (117/264) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (268/580) |
| 41% (1046/2521) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2363/5653) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 44.93% (31/38) | Futures W/L | 58.04% (65/47) |
| 44% (31/71) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (64/112) |
| 50% (5/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (10/25) |
| 50% (12/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 76% (29/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (68/55) |
| 24% (29/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (68/13) |
| 21% (42/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (47/9) |